Comments on: Simple Web Hosting Performance Test: 1and1 versus HostICan http://tipsfor.us/2007/07/22/simple-web-hosting-performance-test-1and1-versus-hostican/ Tech Tips, Reviews, Tutorials, Occasional Rants Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:50:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8 By: alex http://tipsfor.us/2007/07/22/simple-web-hosting-performance-test-1and1-versus-hostican/#comment-1113 Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:49:13 +0000 http://tipsfor.us/?p=147#comment-1113 How about 1x webhosting? I’m hearing good things about it but they tell me the average transfer rate is around 70-100kbps which sounds very slow.

]]>
By: Hosting admin http://tipsfor.us/2007/07/22/simple-web-hosting-performance-test-1and1-versus-hostican/#comment-1112 Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:39 +0000 http://tipsfor.us/?p=147#comment-1112 1ana1 is not very good to work with. Of course, where is different opinions but this is mine.

]]>
By: Third Party Independant Review Found - 1&1 Vs HostICan - HostICan Hosting Reviews http://tipsfor.us/2007/07/22/simple-web-hosting-performance-test-1and1-versus-hostican/#comment-1111 Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:59:43 +0000 http://tipsfor.us/?p=147#comment-1111 […] sure to read the entire habibbijan HostICan Review review. It’s a great […]

]]>
By: Sungho http://tipsfor.us/2007/07/22/simple-web-hosting-performance-test-1and1-versus-hostican/#comment-1110 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:15:43 +0000 http://tipsfor.us/?p=147#comment-1110 So, based on my very unscientific conclusion, yes, 1and1’s servers are slow, at least in comparison to HostICan. —– It’s true, very slow..

]]>